1 Comment
author

Author here. Out of curiosity I prompted ChatGPT to write an essay about Enlightenment Age ideas in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. I was wondering how it would compare to my essay. Here's what I got:

You said:

write an essay about enlightenment era ideas in mary Shelley's Frankenstein

ChatGPT said:

ChatGPT

Enlightenment Era Ideas in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, published in 1818, is a profound exploration of the interplay between the Enlightenment era’s ideals and the darker implications of human ambition. The Enlightenment, characterized by an emphasis on reason, scientific inquiry, and individualism, profoundly influenced Shelley’s work, shaping both her themes and her characters. Through Victor Frankenstein’s relentless pursuit of knowledge and the creature’s quest for acceptance and understanding, Shelley critiques the potential dangers of unchecked rationalism and the ethical ramifications of scientific exploration.

At the heart of the Enlightenment was the belief in the power of reason and empirical evidence as the primary means of acquiring knowledge. Victor Frankenstein embodies this ideal; he is a product of the Enlightenment’s reverence for science and discovery. His initial enthusiasm for unlocking the secrets of life represents the era's spirit of inquiry. Victor’s studies at the University of Ingolstadt and his obsession with reanimating the dead reflect a burgeoning belief in the potential of science to transcend natural boundaries. This aspiration mirrors Enlightenment thinkers like Francis Bacon and René Descartes, who championed the pursuit of knowledge as a means of improving humanity’s condition.

However, Shelley’s portrayal of Victor’s ambition also serves as a cautionary tale. While Enlightenment ideals advocate for the pursuit of knowledge, Victor’s quest reveals the perils of hubris and ethical neglect. He becomes so consumed by his desire to create life that he disregards the moral implications of his actions. This thematic conflict underscores a central critique of the Enlightenment: the danger of prioritizing scientific advancement over ethical considerations. Victor’s failure to take responsibility for his creation leads to tragedy, suggesting that unbridled rationalism, devoid of compassion and foresight, can yield disastrous consequences.

The creature, too, reflects Enlightenment themes, particularly those related to individualism and the quest for identity. Initially innocent and full of potential, the creature seeks understanding and companionship in a world that ultimately rejects him. His journey echoes the Enlightenment emphasis on self-formation and the pursuit of happiness. However, the creature’s experiences highlight the limitations of Enlightenment ideals when confronted with societal prejudice and isolation. His transformation from a hopeful being into a vengeful figure illustrates the destructive effects of alienation and the failure of society to recognize the inherent worth of every individual, regardless of their origins.

Moreover, the creature’s articulate expressions of longing for connection and acceptance challenge the Enlightenment notion of the “noble savage.” Rousseau posited that humans are inherently good but corrupted by society. Shelley complicates this view by demonstrating that it is not the creature’s inherent nature that leads to his moral decline but the rejection and hatred he faces from humanity. This tension invites readers to reflect on the Enlightenment belief in the perfectibility of man through reason and education, questioning whether societal progress can truly be achieved without empathy and understanding.

In addition, the novel engages with the Enlightenment’s relationship with nature. The period saw a shift from a view of nature as something to be dominated and controlled to one that appreciated its beauty and complexity. Shelley navigates this duality through Victor’s interactions with the natural world. While he initially seeks to harness nature’s power for his own ends, his later encounters in the sublime landscapes of the Alps evoke a sense of awe and humility. This shift signifies a recognition that nature holds forces beyond human comprehension and control, aligning with the Romantic response to Enlightenment rationalism that emphasizes emotional depth and the interconnectedness of humanity and nature.

In conclusion, Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein intricately weaves Enlightenment ideas with a cautionary narrative that critiques the era's blind spots. While the novel reflects the spirit of inquiry and individualism championed by Enlightenment thinkers, it also reveals the potential perils of unchecked ambition and the ethical responsibilities that accompany knowledge. Through Victor Frankenstein and his creature, Shelley invites readers to contemplate the balance between scientific progress and moral integrity, ultimately asserting that enlightenment without empathy can lead to profound disillusionment and tragedy. Thus, Frankenstein remains a timeless exploration of the complexities of human ambition, knowledge, and the quest for identity in a rapidly changing world.

Expand full comment